Both Mode Shape and Operation Deflection Shape (ODS) display the vibration on a drawing or picture of a machine.
Mode shape (based on the inherent resonance of a structure) can be determined if a hammer or bump test can produce those frequencies on the machine when not in use.
ODS (based on the source frequencies and the resonance frequencies) can be determined from roving and reference measurements on the machine while in actual use.
The methods are useful in determining where the vibration appears on a machine, where the nodes and anti-nodes are, where is the source of the vibration, and where the structure should be re-enforced.
Is It a Mode Shape, or an Operating Deflection Shape?
Mark H. Richardson, Vibrant Technology, Inc., Jamestown, California
Sound & Vibration Magazine 30th Anniversary Issue March 1997
Abstract
Mode shapes and operating "deflection" shapes are related
to one another. In fact, one is always measured in
order to obtain the other. Yet, they are quite different
from one another in a number of ways. This article discusses
the relationships between modal testing, modal
analysis and operating deflection shape measurements.
Introduction
The question, "Is it a mode shape, or an operating deflection
shape?" is probably asked more often than any other
when testing structures, especially when attempting to
identify their resonant or modal properties. Another way
that it is asked is, "When the excitation changes, the mode
shape changes. What's going on here?"
The subject of mode shapes versus operating deflection
shapes has certainly been written about before. In fact, a
previous Sound and Vibration magazine article [1] covered
them quite extensively. I recommend that you read that
article, because it provides valuable insight and contains a
number of examples. To shed more light on this subject, I
will point out other similarities and differences between the
two types of shapes, and discuss the measurements required
to obtain each of them.
Over the past 20 years, the number of ways in which modal
testing has been done has proliferated greatly. Traditionally,
most modal testing was done using sine wave based
methods and analog instrumentation. During the late
1960s however, the discovery of the Fast Fourier Transform
(FFT) algorithm and the use of digital computers in laboratory
testing systems allowed experimentalists to begin
exploring the use of new excitation and signal processing
techniques for modal testing.
Because the FFT provides the frequency spectrum of a signal
in fractions of a second, various kinds of broad band
random, swept sine, and transient signals, which excite
many frequencies at once, could be used to excite structures
and measure their responses. Impact testing has become
the most popular modal testing method today. It can be
done rather quickly and inexpensively using an instrumented
hammer, an accelerometer, a 2 channel FFT analyzer,
and post processing software. Also, the availability
of lower cost transducers, PC based data acquisition systems,
portable data collectors, desktop and notebook computers,
and more powerful software have all helped to put
modal testing into the hands of more practitioners.
Nevertheless, modal analysis has often been shrouded in a
veil of mystery, while the concept of an operating deflection
shape has remained relatively straightforward. Ole Dossing
began his article with the statements,
"Operational deflection shapes (ODSs) can be measured
directly by relatively simple means. They provide very
useful information for understanding and evaluating the
absolute dynamic behavior of a machine, component or
an entire structure.''
This suggests that maybe mode shapes are not so easy to
measure. If not, then why not.
For the complete article please click here.
Please note: Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.
Which is a free download from the Adobe website.
